ROLE OF MOSQUE AND
RELIGIOUS LEADERS IN MOBILIZING COMMUNITIES AGAINST DRUGS
Comm. Taha M. Basman
UNESCO Commissioner
and President, Philippine Islamic Council
(Paper presented
during the “INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS/ISLAMIC
SCHOLARS ON DRUG POLICIES AND STRATEGIES,” 27 February – 1 March 2006, Jakarta,
Indonesia, Colombo Plan drug Advisory Program (CP-DAP)
Alhamdulillah… Assalamu Alaikum.
I praise the Almighty and I extend the
greetings of Peace to all!
The presence of your Filipino Muslim
brothers in this Conference, despite the political turmoil raging in our
country today, manifest in no uncertain terms the significance and urgency we
place on the issues laid down for discussion in this gathering of Muslim
scholars and Faith-based organizations. Our crisis in the Philippines is an Emergency, which implies tentativeness. On the other hand, the crisis we
will discuss in this Forum is more serious since it will outgrow any political
leader and government if Divine Will does not intervene to contain the problem.
The drug menace has permeated every nook
and cranny of the world. It has not spared a particular class or religious
group. It has victimized all sectors of society – male and female, young and
old, affluent and impoverished, modern and primitive, liberal and conservative,
right and left, West and East, Muslims and everybody else alike. In short, the
menace does not recognize borders!
The resort to spirituality now becomes
imperative after all other efforts at neutralizing the onslaught of illegal
drugs against the community seem futile. This only shows the dismay of the
duly constituted authorities in fighting the scourge. By “throwing in the
towel,” the government officials are now invoking divine intervention through
the places of worship, like the mosque, and the affective “khutba” and/or
“fatwa” of the religious leaders since the usual measures advanced to solve the
drug problem only complicated the situation. It behooves us, therefore, to
summon all resources and assistance – even the unorthodox ones – to put to rest
this moral, spiritual, familial, psychological, financial, and social decadence
whose tentacles have destroyed all gains made in various fields of endeavor
that promote peace and happiness in the community.
ISLAMIC VIEWPOINT
Questions are asked on the basis of them
all – our fight against drugs by Muslim leaders and governments. Since “drugs”
are not specifically mentioned in the Qur’anic prohibitions, the reference to
“alcohol” (khamr) as stated in the Holy Book becomes very significant.
One publication that explains in detail
the Islamic viewpoint on the issue was written by Dr. Suleiman Bin Abdul Rahman
Al-Hageel in 2001. According to this respected scholar, the penalties for
“alcohol” and “illegal drugs” are comparable.
The term “alcohol” (khamr) refers to any
and all intoxicating beverages, and such is forbidden by Islam whether the
amount taken is big or small. As Allah (swt) declares, “O ye who believe!
Intoxicants and gambling, (dedication of) stones, and (divination by) arrows
are forms of abomination; they are Satan’s handiworks: Eschew such
(abomination) that ye may prosper.” Moreover, as the Messenger of God (may
peace and blessings be upon him) said, “Every intoxicant is a kind of alcohol,
and all alcohols are forbidden.”
In order for the penalty to be carried
out against someone who has drunk, a number of conditions must be fulfilled,
the most important of which is that the person be a healthy adult, and
consenting Muslim in full possession of his sound faculties who knows that
alcohol is forbidden in Islam. If the person concerned is ill, the penalty
still applies, but its execution is to be postponed until he recovers from his
illness.
Islam has prohibited alcohol because it
operates in conflict with the intention in which Allah created human beings to
live. It paralyzes human activities; deactivates the mind; it corrupts one’s
religions; it causes one to lose his morals; and it destroys the soul. Its
evil is not restricted to the individual alone; rather it goes beyond the
person who drinks it to affect others, since he may kill, steal, and commit
sexual immorality under its influence.
This, then, reveals the wisdom in the
prohibition of alcohol in Islam and the enforcement of the Islamically
prescribed penalty against those who desire to drink. However, despite the
clarity of this wisdom, some people claim that enforcing the Islamic penalty
for drunkenness involves a violation of human rights. Such a claim is invalid,
for human beings are not simply free to drink whatever they please; rather they
are bound to abide by the provisions of Islamic Shariah. In fact, a Muslim is
not free to do anything harmful to himself, since he does not belong to himself
alone. Hence, he has the obligation to abide by the public order, to be
sensitive to other’s feelings, and to demonstrate solidarity with other members
of society since they are a single body.
The problem with drugs, on the other
hand, is one of worldwide proportion and worse than alcohol. In order to
combat drugs, conferences have been convened, seminars have been held, and
agreements have been concluded among various nation-states. Various bodies and
organizations confronted this plague, especially since drugs have become a
danger threatening security in all countries of the world, both industrialized
and developing nations.
There is no explicit text in either the
Holy Qur’an or the Sunnah of the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon
him) which sets forth the ruling on drugs, since drugs were not known
during the life of the Prophet (PBUH). Rather, they did not come to be
known by this name until centuries later. Due to the absence of the term in
the Holy Qur’an and the Sacred Sunnah, Muslim scholars have taken pains to
identify what this ruling is, relying on their deductions from texts and
comprehensive rules within Islamic legislation. Scholars from all the various
legal schools are in agreement that illegal drugs of all forms are prohibited
in Islam, and taking them is a major sin for which offenders have to be
punished both in this life and the hereafter.
Illegal drugs are prohibited in Islam
because they operate in conflicts with the manner in which Allah created human
beings to live. The following are some of the reasons for which the Islam
Sahri’a has forbidden drugs:
1. Drugs drive people to
commit acts of disobedience, thereby subjecting them to punishment both in this
world and in the hereafter.
2. They cloud the
thinking and, in one way or another, cause alterations in the mind.
3. Taking drugs causes
serious harm to the health, damaging vital body organs such as the brain, the
nerves, the liver, the lungs, and the respiratory system.
4. They cause enmity and
hatred, distracting people form the remembrance of Allah and prayer, and
disrupting family ties.
5. Drugs place the person
who takes them in an uncomfortable position vis-à-vis the rest of society; he
becomes an outcast who is hated by family members and others, who fear they
might fall under the influence or be tempted to commit the same iniquities,
since by using drugs, he has become unfaithful and untrustworthy.
6. Drugs cause a person
to appear in an undignified state, leading him to live immodestly and
disrespectfully and robbing him of his usual self as a sober personality.
7. Drugs produce
deleterious effects in a person’s state of mind, feeling of inferiority,
self-contempt, unhappiness, anxiety, and distress.
8. They are a waste of
money and bring no benefit to the user and which brings harm to the whole
community.
9. They distract the
person from his work and from other productive activities which could bring
benefit to him and his community, and
10. They turn the person
into a self-centered creature who spends all his wealth on his own pleasures
and cravings, meanwhile abandoning his children and parents to fend for
themselves. He demonstrates no solidarity with his community, since he neither
pays zakat nor gives charity. He is, in short, a harmful member of society, and
through this the wisdom of Islam’s prohibition of drugs are clearly seen.
Illegal drugs may then be described as
the crime of the age, whose victims are millions of people who are enslaved,
then discarded. The international community has attempted to deal with this
problem in all possible ways, however, it has not been able to solve the
problem by means of positive legislation. Hence, the time has come for the
international community to adopt the Islamic approach in combating this curse –
that is, the approach which is harsher than the usual kiddie-glove treatment
which we give to the drug lords, pushers and users. The religious leaders,
under the concept of “Ulil Amr” must go beyond the usual rounds they make in
the communities to stop the menace by using also the pulpit and the facilities
of the mosque to make the anti-illegal drug campaign effective. The
above-enumerated points must be highlighted by the religious leaders in
spearheading the community-wide campaign against illegal drugs. It is now time
to recall the past roles of the Mosque to accomplish this noble mission.
BEYOND THE PRAYERS IN THE MOSQUE
The gravity of the “drug problem”
necessitates the utilization of all institutions to come to the rescue of
humanity and its abode, the community. One such institution is the Mosque
(MASJID).
The roles of the mosque, however,
changed over time. Right now, the regular image of the mosque is that of a
place of worship only. There are moments, in fact, when in-between the
five-time daily prayers, many mosques are empty of congregationists and useful
activities – spiritual, educational, societal, and the like. After the prayer,
people leave the mosque to turn it into a haunted place without any spiritual
or useful activity being undertaken within its premises. It is, therefore,
necessary to recall the versatility of the mosques during the heyday of the
Caliphates. We must go beyond the prayers to make the Mosque a citadel of
spiritual, social, and educational programs to make the community free from the
bad effects of illegal drugs.
According to the noble scholar
(Mubarakputri, 2004), the glowing and fervent faces of the Ansar and the hearty
welcome which the people of Aws and Khazraj had accorded to the Prophet (PBUH)
prompted him to construct, before doing anything else, a public center for the Muslims
with the name of ‘masjid,’ so that matters relating to instruction,
development, politics and justice might be accomplished there. And as
invitation to the worship of One Lord and Nourisher was the first item in his
programme, he considered it necessary, first of all, to build a place of
worship where the Muslims should engage themselves in remembering Allah (swt)
and glorify His name at the time of offering prayers.
It was also necessary that he should
create a center where the common members of the Islamic party (the party of
Allah) should assemble every week on a fixed day and conduct discussions and
consultations regarding the interests of Islam and of the Muslims, and should,
besides meeting every day, offer Eid prayers there twice a year.
The place (mosque) was not only a
central place for worship. It was a place, where all types of Islamic
instructions and orders were given and every sort of religious and scientific
education was imparted, including reading and writing. Till the commencement
of the fourth Islamic century, the mosques served as schools which functioned
at all times, except those fixed for offering prayers. Thereafter, the
educational centers assumed a special shape. Most of the great scholars
graduated from the educational circles which had been set up in the mosques.
The Al-Aqsa Mosque also pioneered in the
establishment of educational institutions within the premises to respond to the
need of enlightening the congregation about important knowledge and information
for their welfare. These were the schools, as described by old researchers.
(Prism; 2002)
Al-Tankiziyyah School:
It is adjacent to As-Silsilih Door. It was
built by Prince Tankiz An-Nasseri the Governor of the Levant. He started its
construction in 727 H. and finished it in 729 H. It is a large school and has
a complex at the western side of Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Al-Tuluniyyah School:
It was build by Shibab ed-Din Al-Tuluni to
the west of Al-Asbat Door, one of the northern doors of the mosque. He
dedicated it to Sultan Az-Zaher Barquoq. When Barquoq passed away, his son
Al-Nasser Farag took care of it. When his sister Khawand Sarah died, she was
buried in it. After the death of Sultan Farag, Mohammad Sah el-Rumi bought the
school.
Al-Qaderiyyah School:
It was established by Prince Nasser
ed-din Mohammed ibn Khalil Zul Qader. The name was mentioned in different
ways: Zul Ghader, Zal Qader and Dal Qader, but it is most likely Khalil Adham
Zul Qader. He belonged to the Qaderiyyah family that had ruled from 740 H. to
928 H. (1339-1521 A.D.) the region extending between Aleppo and Turkey. Prince Mohammad ibn Zul Qader died at the beginning of the month of Jummah
Al-‘Akbar in the year 846 H./1441 A.D.
Majid ed-Din reported that Prince Nasser
ed-Din Mohammad ibn Zul Qader endowed a school inside the mosque built by his
wife Misr Khatun in the reign of Sultan Birsbay. The school overlooks the
northern riwaq of the Holy Mosque between the minaret of Al-Asbat Door and
Al-Hittah Door. On its top floor there is a mosque. As for the riwaq, it was
built before the school during the rule of Sultan Sha’ban in 769 H./1367 A.D. The
design of the Qaderiyyah School was closely related to its location that
overlooks the Holy Mosque 9in Jerusalem). (This school has endowment deed).
Al-Basitiyyah School:
It overlooks the northern riwaq of the Holy
Mosque (in Jerusalem) beside the Honorable Prophets’ (or Al-Atam) Door and a
section of it is mounted on the Dawidareyya KHanqa (sufi school). It
was endowed by judge Zein ed-Din Abd al-Basit ibn Khalil al-Damashqi,
the commander of the victorious armies and the ruler of the kingdom. It was
reported that the first one who laid down the school foundation was Sheikh
Al-Islam Sheikh ed-din Mohammad el-Harawi Sheikh of Al-Salehiyyah School in
Jerusalem and the administrator of the Two Holy Shrines. He died before
finishing its building and was completed by Abd al-Basit ibn Khalil who endowed
it in Jummadi Al-Awal, 834 H. The main entrance is elevated and is situated at
the main southern facade of the school overlooking the Dome of the Rock. The
entrance has been closed and the school has been currently been transformed
into an Islamic college.
The Basitiyyah School is similar to the
Qaderiyyah School as its design and constuction is closely related to its
location that overlooks the northern riwaq of the Holy Mosque. (The school has
an endowment deed).
On the other hand, the Mosque of Madina
assumes the shape of a literacy center also. Great poets of Arabia, whose
compositions conformed with the moral and educational spirit of Islam recited
their verses before the Prophet. Ka’b bin Zuhayr read out his famous laudatory
poem in praise of the Prophet before him in the mosque and received a large
prize and robe of honour from him. Hassan bin Thabit, who defended the honour
of Islam by means of his verses, used to read out to him poems in the Mosque of
the Prophet.
Educational meetings in the Mosque of
Madina, during the time of the Prophet, were so impressive that the representatives
of the tribe of ‘Saqif’ were very much impressed by the scene; they wondered at
the interest taken by the Muslims in acquiring knowledge. Judicial matters and
lawsuits were settled, and punishments were awarded to offenders in the mosque,
and it was, for all intents and purposes, a court of law where the complaints
of the people were settled. Furthermore, the Prophet used to deliver his
stirring speeches there to make the people perform jihad and campaign against
infidelity. Possibly one of the secrets of combination of religious and
educational matters in the mosque was that the great leaders of Islam desired
to show it practically that knowledge and faith are complementary to each
other, and if a place is a center of faith, it must also be a center of
knowledge and wisdom. And if the judicial and other affairs including matters
related to jihad were decided in the mosque, it was for the reason that he
wanted to make it clear that his religion is not only spiritual which should
have nothing to do with material matters, it is a religion which, while
inviting people to piety and faith, does not also ignore the worldly matters
and social welfare.
This harmony (between knowledge and
faith) is the motto of the Muslims even today. When educational centers with a
special shape were set up later, the schools and universities were always
established by the side of Jami Masjids (central mosque) so as to prove to the
world that these two factors of prosperity are not separate from each other.
Mosques must be the center for jihad
against the drug lords, protectors, pushers, and users if the Muslim
communities have to be rid of society’s filth.
PHILIPPINES
CASE
PROFILE
OF DRUG ABUSERS
(Information
from the Dangerous Drugs Board (DDB))
AGE:
Mean
age of 25 years
SEX:
Ratio
of male to female 10:1
CIVIL
STATUS:
Single
62.05%
Married
24.75%
Live-in
6.12%
FAMILY
SIZE: Average
of Four (4) siblings in the family
OCCUPATION:
Unemployed 32.64%
Workers/Employees 31.48%
Students
7.82%
EDUCATIONAL
ATTAINMENT:
High
School Level 33.18%
High
School Graduate 16.77%
College
Level 24.96%
ECONOMICS
STATUS: P
4, 858.90 average monthly Family income
DURATION
OF DRUG TAKING: More
than (2) years
I.Q.:
Average
NATURE
OF DRUG-TAKING:
Poly drug-use
DRUGS
OF ABUSE: Shabu
Marijuana
Cough
Syrup in combination with alcoholic Beverages
Among the drug cases under study, thirty
three (33.18%) percent attained high school education, followed by those who
reached elementary education with eight (8.34%) percent. This trend, more or
less, is indicative of high literacy level among rehab center confines.
With regard to occupation status,
unemployed individuals dominated the distribution with thirty-two (32.64%)
percent followed by those who were employed (non-government/government workers)
with thirty-one (31.48 %) percent.
The average income for rehab center
confines/clients is P4, 858.90. Interestingly, twenty-seven (27.90%) percent
have been reported to be earning more than P5, 000 a month. While sixty-one (61.28%)
percent failed to specify their income.
More than half (55.62%) of the total
number of client were National Capital Region (NCR) residents. Twenty0five
(25.20%) percent were from Region IV, Ehile Region VII had five (5.91%)
percent.
Shabu abuse increased from fifty-six
(56.95%) percent in 1994 to seventy-five (75.09%) percent in 1995, edging out
Marijuana with a difference of twenty-five (25.4%) percent. This increase can
be attributed to the increasing number of clients who were above twenty years
old.
Our fight against drug abuse is far from
over. However, with utmost dedication and cooperation from allied agencies and
people involved in the fight against it, the realization towards a drug-free
society may not be far from being attained. The above data are shown to
indicate their accessibility by the religious leaders, and their neophytes
status implies relative ease in making them normal again if the mosque and the
religious leaders are tapped to become partners of the community in the fight
against illegal drugs.
Mobilizing the Community
The religious leaders can mobilize the
residents of the community through many ways. Utilizing the local anti-drug
councils, community members are encouraged to identify their own problems and
plan strategies and implement solutions based on available resources. The
community approach employs the following activities:
·
Community
assemblies within the Mosque premises: Here, the religious leaders talk to a
large group composed of community leaders and influential people. The objective
of the assembly is to exchange views and ideas on local drug problems. It is an
opportunity for the religious leaders and drug abuse prevention workers to
teach the participants relevant information about the drug problem thus
motivating them to help in the crusade against drug abuse.
·
Town
fairs. Town fiestas and fairs are excellent venues for putting across drug
abuse prevention messages. These messages may be incorporated in such
activities as exhibits and contests.
·
Sports
festivals. These sports events provide the youth wholesome channels through
which they can devote their excess energies. Physical fitness programs develop
their potentials in various sports activities.
·
Other
community-based programs. Recommended are contests in essay-writing,
poster-making, slogans, jingles, painting, and other art activities. The youth
can also be tapped to help in community activities such as clean-up drives,
tree-planting, summer camps, campus crusade and other spiritual-related programs.
·
Khutba
and Fatwas on the issue of drug prevention must be regular to have lasting
effects on the targets clientele.
CONCLUSION
There are painful realities we have to
accept on order to address the illegal drug problem effectively. The
Philippines, for example, has to grapple with the demoralizing record of having
3.4 million illegal drug abusers which constitute more than 4% of its total
population. As defined by the authorities in the Philippines, particularly the
Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG), National Police Commission
(NAPOLCOM), Dangerous Drug Board (DDB) and the other Agencies, drug abusers are
those who use illegal drugs at least twice (2x) a week. At the prevailing rate
of Philippine pesos 5,000 (USD100) per gram, the consumption of the drug
abusers amount to the following:
Weekly – USD 340
million (PHP 17, 680, 000, 000)
Monthly – USD 1.36 billion (PHP
70, 720, 000, 000)
Yearly – USD 16.32
million (PHP 848, 640, 000, 000)
Illegal drugs, therefore, is a very big
industry in the Philippines and the annual sales of USD 16.32 billion can
almost wipe-out the foreign debt of the country if one annual sales volume is
diverted for the purpose.
It may interest our Muslim brothers and
sisters assembled here today to know that of the 3.4 million drug abusers in
the Philippines, Metro Manila tops the list with 1.8 million abusers, and the
Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) particularly Lanao del Sur, ranks
second.
The Muslim religious leaders, not only
in the Philippines and in Indonesia but in the whole world, must therefore,
give serious thoughts about the moral and spiritual decadence happening in our
midst. A caveat, however, is in order - we have to make our actions legal and
acceptable to the duly constituted authorities, as well as the community, in
order to sustain the program and make them attractive and effective.
What do I mean by this? At one time,
when Lanao del Sur, where the Muslim population is 95% and the local ulama
constitute about 80% of the total number of Muslim religious leaders in the
Philippines, was mentioned to rank next to Metro Manila in the number of drugs
abusers, the Muslim rebel group “Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) took up
the cudgels of hosting Muslim Youth Drug addicts in Camp Busra for
rehabilitation. Many of the drug addicts were reformed, and some even became
“hafiz” after staying in the rebel camp for a few years. However, the
rehabilitation program of the MILF had to be stopped when the Philippine
Government got wind of the “illegal and illegitimate” activity. And this is
where the Colombo Plan, the Muslim Religious Leaders, and other Concerned Drug
Boards can help – to establish Halfway Houses and/or Rehabilitation Centers
right in the heart of Muslim communities (like Lanao del Sur) where illegal
drugs are becoming a booming industry. The Centers in Cotabato and Palawan
cannot cater to the needs of the drug abusers in Lanao due to distance.
Many organizations have declared their
intention to join the efforts in the fight against illegal drugs. Among these
are: Philippine Islamic Council, the Center for Moderate Muslims, the Islamic
Da’wah Council of the Philippines, the Markazo Shabab, the Tableegh, and the
Government institution, Office on Muslim Affairs.
At the rate things are going, we may be
raising more questions than answer to the problems confronting us regarding
illegal drugs. Some of the questions are:
1. Shall we adopt the
“life boat principle” of saving only the useful members of the community due to
our “limited capacity,” and getting rid of the useless and bad elements of such
community? (That means, shall we adopt the death penalty to punish the drug
abusers even if our governments do not approve of it?);
2. Shall we involve the
religious leaders among the rebel groups (MILF, etc.) who have shown effective
programs in the past? (That means, shall we legalize and legitimize the
assistance of illegal and illegitimate groups?);
3. Shall we allow the
vigilante group (in Davao, and now in Manila) to continue “salvaging” the “drug
abusers” due to the seeming helplessness of the duly constituted authorities to
“arrest” the problem? (That means, shall we allow anarchy to reign supreme?);
and
4. Shall we allow the
“mosques’ to operate like a half-way house and/or social welfare agency cum
guidance counseling institution in order to transform the community into a
haven of morally upright individual? (That means, shall we allow the mosque to
shed-off its “ittiqaf” and spiritual images to concentrate on the reformation
of the “sinners”?
The list of contradictions can get longer
but, in the end, we should ask ourselves, “Can we count on each one to fight
illegal drugs, despite the odds and the ironies?” Thank you, wassalam!
REFERENCES:
· Dr. Mohammad Ilyas
Abdul Ghani, THE HISTORY OF MAKKAH MUHARRAMAH (1st Edition), 2004: Al Rasheed
Printers (Translated by: Mufti Afzah Hoosen Elias)
· Prof. Dr. Suliman Bin
Abdul Rahman Al-Hageel, HUMAN RIGHTS IN ISLAM AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN THE
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA (1st Edition) 2001: Sulaiman ibn Abdurrahman Al-Hujail
(Translated by: Dr. Omer F. Atari)
· Sh. Hamoud M.
Al-Lahim, THE FOUNDATIONS WHICH MAN WILL BE ASKED ABOUT IN THE GRAVE AND ON THE
DAY OF JUDGEMENT (2nd Edition) 2002: Islamic Studies Call &
Guidance-Philippines (Translated by: Dr. Ibrahim S. Abu Nayyam)
· ASEAN, Asean Plan of
Action on Drug Abuse Control, 1994: Asean Secretariat, Jakarta
· ASEAN, Medium Term
Programme on Drug Abuse Control (1996-1998), 1995: Asean Secretariat, Jakarta
· M. Fetullah Gullen,
PROPHET MUHAMMAD: THE INFINITE LIGHT (2nd edition) 1998: Kaynak (izmir) A.S.,
Turkey
· Syed A’ala Mawdudi,
ISLAMIC WAY OF LIFE, 1996: Cooperative Office for Call & Guidance &
Batha
· David W. Maurer, Ph.
D. & Victor H. Vogel, MPH, MD, NARCOTICS AND NARCOTIC ADDICTION (3rd
Edition), 1971: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Illinois, USA.
· Shaikh Safiur-Rahman
Mubarakpuri, HISTORY OF MADINAH MUNAWWARAH (2nd Edition) 2004: Maktaba
Dar-ru-Salam, Research and Compilation Department
· Abu Ameenah Bilal
Philips, THE EVOLUTION OF FIQH, 1990: Tawheed Publications, Riyadh
· PRISM, Ministry of
Culture, Egypt Foreign Cultural Relations, Foreign Press & Information
(FPI)
March 2006